Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

2016 California Proposition 64

« Back to Glossary Index

History and Background

  • Cannabis possession and sale federally prohibited since the 1970 Controlled Substances Act.
  • California’s journey: rejected Prop 19 in 1972, passed Prop 215 in 1996.
  • Governor Brown signed the Moscone Act in 1976.
  • Legalization efforts culminated in Prop 64 in 2016.

Content of Proposition 64

  • Legalized possession, cultivation, and sale of marijuana.
  • Introduced a 15% excise tax on marijuana sales.
  • Revenue allocated to youth programs, environmental cleanup, and public safety.
  • Regulated product development, testing, packaging, and labeling.
  • Established the Bureau of Marijuana Control for regulation.

Impact and Implementation

  • Legalization for adults 21+ with state taxes on sales and cultivation.
  • Licensing and standards for marijuana products.
  • Local regulation and taxation permitted.
  • Increased tax revenues for specific purposes and reduced criminal justice costs.
  • Implementation saw recreational sales start in 2018, allowing possession of up to an ounce and home cultivation of six plants.

Supporters and Opponents

  • Notable supporters included Bernie Sanders, Nancy Pelosi, and the California Medical Association.
  • Opponents like the California Association of Highway Patrolmen and Senator Dianne Feinstein raised concerns.
  • Proponents spent $24.7 million, while opponents invested $1.6 million in the campaign.
  • Public opinion polls consistently showed majority support for legalization.

Impact on Legalization and Public Opinion

  • Proposition 64 aimed to reduce marijuana-related incarceration rates.
  • Continued efforts for further decriminalization through acts like the MORE Act.
  • Concerns over racial disparities in incarceration rates and the need for sentence changes post-Prop 64.
  • California’s influence as a regulatory laboratory and its significant legal cannabis market in the U.S. were highlighted.

2016 California Proposition 64 Data Sources

Reference URL
Glossary https:/glossary/2016-california-proposition-64
Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_California_Proposition_64
Wikidata https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q24908820
Knowledge Graph https://www.google.com/search?kgmid=/g/11cn5k797x
DBPedia http://dbpedia.org/resource/2016_California_Proposition_64
Product Ontology http://www.productontology.org/id/2016_California_Proposition_64